Institutional angle mark of territorial clustering of natural and economic formations on innovation hubs basis

Authors

  • В. П. Дубіщев Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University
  • Н. М. Краус Institute of the State Academic Institution «Academy of Financial Management» of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
  • I. Bistryakov SU «Institute of economy of nature use and steady development of NAS of Ukraine».

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2016.3(58).1179

Keywords:

innovative economy, institutional perspective, naturally territorial and economic formation, innovation hub, innovation cluster

Abstract

In this article we have determined that the cluster-based innovation hubs - one of the key drivers of economic growth in the country, provides a comprehensive system to support economic and technological interdependence. We found that in recent decades the idea of creating clusters found its application in virtually all countries: EU, US, Japan, South America, Eastern Europe and Africa. Today cluster model is one of the most effective forms of achieving competitive advantage. We have determined that at this time in Ukraine created conditions for the formation of new types of cluster naturally territorial and economic entities. It is important that the process of decentralization of territorial administration provide impetus for a renewed perception of certain theoretical positions clustering economic space. In particular, project management positions natural resource capital. Thus, with the creation of clusters and providing primarily financial component operation must take into account aspects: production, investment and spatial. The production structure of corporate cluster should have an advantage over other forms of economic institutions, such as branches, technological institutions and others. In content, innovative cluster-based innovation hub must have a membership; centers generate scientific knowledge, business ideas, training centers highly qualified specialists and innovators. The activities of this cluster should be aimed at working with promising market innovation. Innovative clusters on the basis innovation hubs should be viewed as promising «growth point of the innovation economy». The basis of their activity is innovator-man. We prove that innovation hub task should be to create favourable conditions for the development of innovative projects that enhance quality of life. For this reason, innovative designs hub necessarily characterized by opportunities in new ways; ways to solve problems of ecological character and key economic sectors (transport, health, energy, housing, social security, education).

Author Biographies

В. П. Дубіщев, Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University

Doctor of Economics, professor

Н. М. Краус, Institute of the State Academic Institution «Academy of Financial Management» of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine

PhD in Economics

I. Bistryakov, SU «Institute of economy of nature use and steady development of NAS of Ukraine».

Doctor of Economics, professor

References

Kraus N. M. Instytutsional’na proektsiya innovatsiynoho khabu v ramkakh pobudovy konkurentospromozhnoyi natsional’noyi ekonomiky / N. M. Kraus // Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannya ekonomiky : zb. nauk. pr. Kyyiv. nats. un-tuim. Tarasa Shevchenka. – 2015. – # 30. – S. 341–351.

Kraus N. M. Innovatsiyni khaby yak osnova konkurentospromozhnoyi ekonomiky: zakordonnyy vymir ta uroky dlya Ukrayiny [Elektronnyy resurs] / N. M. Kraus // Konkurentospromozhnist’ natsional’noyi ekonomiky : zb. tez XV Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., 26–27 berez. 2015 r., m. Kyyiv. – Elektron. tekst. dani. – K. : [b. v.], 2015. – S. 193–198. – Rezhym dostupu: http://www.econom.univ.kiev.ua/konf_KNE15/about.html

Dubishchev V. P. Instytutsional’na proektsiya klasteryzatsiyi na bazi innovatsiynoho khabu / Dubishchev V. P., Bystryakov I. K., Kraus N.M. // Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ za materialamy VIII Vseukrayins’koyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi «Problemy y perspektyvy rozvytku akademichnoyi ta universytets’koyi nauky», 8–11 hrudnya 2015 roku – Poltava: PoltNTU, 2015. – P. 17–22.

Kraus N. M. Stanovlennya innovatsiynoyi ekonomiky v umovakh instytutsional’nykh zmin : monohrafiya / Kraus N. M. – Kyyiv : Tsentr uchbovoyi l-ry, 2015. – 596 s.

OECD Science, Technoloqy and Industry Outlook 2014 [Electronic resource]. –Mode of access: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oecd-science-technology-and-industry-outlook-2014_sti_outlook-2014-en. – 478 p. – Title from display. – Publicationdate: 12 Nov. 2014. – Dateoftreatment: 19.01.2015.

OECD (2013), OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Sweden 2012, OECD Publishing [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access:http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/science-and-technology/oecd-reviews-of-innovation-policy-sweden-2012_9789264184893-en#page7. – 286 p. – Title from display. – Dateoftreatment: 1.10.2014.

Kraus N. M. Instytutsional’ni aspekty klasteryzatsiyi v innovatsiyniy ekonomitsi pid vplyvom systemnoyi ta kompleksnoyi modernizatsiyi / N. M. Kraus // Ekonomichnyy chasopys – KhKhI. – 2014. – # 5–6. – S. 29–32.

Kraus N. M. Instytutsional’nyy dyzayn mezorivnya innovatsiynoyi ekonomiky: fraktal’no-fasetochna model’ / N. M. Kraus // Ekonomichnyy chasopys. – KhKhI. – 2015. – # 5. – S. 29–32.

Holyan V. A. Problemy formuvannya instytutsional’noho seredovyshcha natsional’noyi ekonomiky v umovakh rynkovykh vidnosyn / V. A. Holyan // Aktual’ni problemy ekonomiky. – 2006. – # 5. – S. 4–11.

Kapitalizatsiya pryrodnykh resursiv: [monohrafiya] / za zah. red. d.e.n., prof., akademika NAAN Ukrayiny M.A. Khvesyka. – K.: Derzhavna Ustanova «Instytut ekonomiky pryrodokorystuvannya ta staloho rozvytku Natsional’noyi akademiyi nauk Ukrayiny», 2014. – 288 s.

Tyshchenko O. M. Klastery yak vektor rozvytku ekonomiky: orhanizatsiya, sutnist’ i kontseptsiyi [Elektronnyy resurs] / O. M. Tyshchenko // Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannya ekonomiky. – 2010. – Vyp. 21. – S. 74–80. – Elektron. tekst. dani. – Rezhym dostupu: http://tppe.econom.univ.kiev.ua/data/2010_21/Zb21_10.pdf. – Nazva z ekrana. – Data perehlyadu: 7.08.2014.

Gorzka G. Knowledge Transfer. The New Core Responsibility of Higher Education Institutions Practice and Perspectives in Russia and Germany / G. Gorzka ;UniKasselTransfer,Ost-West-Wissenschaftszentrum. – Kassel :Kassel university press GmbH, 2012. – 244 p.

Khomenko Ya. V. Instytutsiyne seredovyshche yak osnova staloho ekonomichnoho zrostannya / Ya. V. Khomenko // Naukovi pratsi DonNTU. Seriya ekonomichna. – 2007. – Vyp. 31–3. – S. 164–168.

Bystryakov I. Stanovlennya innovatsiynoyi ekonomiky v umovakh dynamichnykh instytutsional’nykh peretvoren’ / I. Bystryakov, V. Dubishchev // Ekonomist. – 2016. – # 2. – S. 1a–1.

Bystryakov I.K., Bystryakova Yu.I. Pryrodno-resursna paradyhma rehional’noyi ekonomichnoyi polityky / Stratehiya sotsial’no-ekonomichnoho rozvytku Ukrayiny. Zb. nauk. prats’. –K.: KNUKiM, 2015. – S. 160 – 175 (284 s.).

Published

2018-10-28

How to Cite

Дубіщев, В. П., Краус, Н. М., & Bistryakov, I. (2018). Institutional angle mark of territorial clustering of natural and economic formations on innovation hubs basis. Economics and Region, (3(58), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2016.3(58).1179

Issue

Section

ECONOMICS AND NATIONAL ECONOMY MANAGEMENT